Jimmyjack

I think your question might revolve around how much is spent on a pot. I would suggest that with most pots in the $30 to 50 mark, they would spend $5 to 10 to keep them safe.
Those who spend $50 to $150 per pot might spend up to $50 to safeguard them however those who crab well:
* have ways of protecting/camouflaging  their pots already and perhaps have less need of a solution; or/and
*  don't bother in high traffic areas or in times of high flow.

I think your question might revolve around how much is spent on a pot. I would suggest that with most pots in the $30 to 50 mark, they would spend $5 to 10 to keep them safe.
Those who spend $50 to $150 per pot might spend up to $50 to safeguard them however those who crab well:
* have ways of protecting/camouflaging  their pots already and perhaps have less need of a solution; or/and
*  don't bother in high traffic areas or in times of high flow.

Welcome back Angus. Pass on my regards to your dad. Good to see you injecting some life into the pages.

Welcome back Angus. Pass on my regards to your dad. Good to see you injecting some life into the pages.

Welcome back Angus. Pass on my regards to your dad. Good to see you injecting some life into the pages.

I'd have no time for anything else. Up to the Mary and western Fraser last weekend. three small gold spots. No barraa, no threadies, not even a catfish!

I'd have no time for anything else. Up to the Mary and western Fraser last weekend. three small gold spots. No barraa, no threadies, not even a catfish!

I agree up to a point. My fishing this year has been so crap Im beginning to unenjoy it. Like loving to play cricket but getting beaten by ten wickets every week. And being in Brisbane compounds it because it's not like I get away from everything when everyone is getting away from everything at the same time and in the same place. 

I agree up to a point. My fishing this year has been so crap Im beginning to unenjoy it. Like loving to play cricket but getting beaten by ten wickets every week. And being in Brisbane compounds it because it's not like I get away from everything when everyone is getting away from everything at the same time and in the same place. 

I agree up to a point. My fishing this year has been so crap Im beginning to unenjoy it. Like loving to play cricket but getting beaten by ten wickets every week. And being in Brisbane compounds it because it's not like I get away from everything when everyone is getting away from everything at the same time and in the same place. 

Despite having all the attributes it fishes poorly IMO. Always bait around, with some deeper water there and structure. It's like a mini version of the codhole/jewhole at the Maroochydore highway bridge but with much less action. HAve not had much success anywhere on the Pine but that's more a reflection of my skill level than the reality. Def casting upcurrent is the way to go I agree. 

Despite having all the attributes it fishes poorly IMO. Always bait around, with some deeper water there and structure. It's like a mini version of the codhole/jewhole at the Maroochydore highway bridge but with much less action. HAve not had much success anywhere on the Pine but that's more a reflection of my skill level than the reality. Def casting upcurrent is the way to go I agree. 

Despite having all the attributes it fishes poorly IMO. Always bait around, with some deeper water there and structure. It's like a mini version of the codhole/jewhole at the Maroochydore highway bridge but with much less action. HAve not had much success anywhere on the Pine but that's more a reflection of my skill level than the reality. Def casting upcurrent is the way to go I agree. 

Dont forget the fuel tank...

I have seen some big improvements with a stainless prop. There is so much less flex and it bites hard so better response. But it can be negated if you have the wrong size and pitch, or the wrong depth setting on your motor. 

OK gotcha and agree! 

I agree that tiges were as deserved winners as cows, but respectfully point out that a  penalty doesn't need to have the potential to score points as an outcome to be awarded.
As someone said somewhere, theyve seen a hundred given and a hundred ignored in the same situation. He did change hhis line but it wouldnt have changed the result. Hard on the Tiges. Having said that, how was Taumololo going to be stopped last weekend when refs ruled interference. And the penalty against Parra earlier in the weekend was much worse. On both last night's occasion and Thursday's occasion, the rule was correct but the interpretation wasnt. IMO

OK gotcha and agree! 

I agree that tiges were as deserved winners as cows, but respectfully point out that a  penalty doesn't need to have the potential to score points as an outcome to be awarded.
As someone said somewhere, theyve seen a hundred given and a hundred ignored in the same situation. He did change hhis line but it wouldnt have changed the result. Hard on the Tiges. Having said that, how was Taumololo going to be stopped last weekend when refs ruled interference. And the penalty against Parra earlier in the weekend was much worse. On both last night's occasion and Thursday's occasion, the rule was correct but the interpretation wasnt. IMO

I agree that tiges were as deserved winners as cows, but respectfully point out that a  penalty doesn't need to have the potential to score points as an outcome to be awarded.
As someone said somewhere, theyve seen a hundred given and a hundred ignored in the same situation. He did change hhis line but it wouldnt have changed the result. Hard on the Tiges. Having said that, how was Taumololo going to be stopped last weekend when refs ruled interference. And the penalty against Parra earlier in the weekend was much worse. On both last night's occasion and Thursday's occasion, the rule was correct but the interpretation wasnt. IMO

I agree that tiges were as deserved winners as cows, but respectfully point out that a  penalty doesn't need to have the potential to score points as an outcome to be awarded.
As someone said somewhere, theyve seen a hundred given and a hundred ignored in the same situation. He did change hhis line but it wouldnt have changed the result. Hard on the Tiges. Having said that, how was Taumololo going to be stopped last weekend when refs ruled interference. And the penalty against Parra earlier in the weekend was much worse. On both last night's occasion and Thursday's occasion, the rule was correct but the interpretation wasnt. IMO

I agree that tiges were as deserved winners as cows, but respectfully point out that a  penalty doesn't need to have the potential to score points as an outcome to be awarded.
As someone said somewhere, theyve seen a hundred given and a hundred ignored in the same situation. He did change hhis line but it wouldnt have changed the result. Hard on the Tiges. Having said that, how was Taumololo going to be stopped last weekend when refs ruled interference. And the penalty against Parra earlier in the weekend was much worse. On both last night's occasion and Thursday's occasion, the rule was correct but the interpretation wasnt. IMO

I agree that tiges were as deserved winners as cows, but respectfully point out that a  penalty doesn't need to have the potential to score points as an outcome to be awarded.
As someone said somewhere, theyve seen a hundred given and a hundred ignored in the same situation. He did change hhis line but it wouldnt have changed the result. Hard on the Tiges. Having said that, how was Taumololo going to be stopped last weekend when refs ruled interference. And the penalty against Parra earlier in the weekend was much worse. On both last night's occasion and Thursday's occasion, the rule was correct but the interpretation wasnt. IMO

NIce. He'll be well muscled with that breeding. Just watch him over the heifers, probably throw a sizeable calf but I'm sure from what  you've said that you'll be aware of that.

What sort of bull?